Certification Exam Guidelines,
Fees, Security, JTA, Confidentiality
Under ISO/IEC 17024
requirements, the Certifying Body of GAFM AAPM IBS requires each applicant to pass an
approved ISO 17024 Comprehensive Exam Assessment.
GAFM, IBS, and AAPM
adhere to ISO/IEC 17024 international standards, which establish requirements for the
competence of personnel certification bodies. These organizations are collectively referred
to as the Board of Standards or Certifying Body (CB). To schedule an exam, you can contact
them directly or through their training providers.
Under ISO/IEC 17024
requirements, GAFM/IBS/AAPM are responsible for assessing and certifying individuals'
competence in various fields, including management systems, project management, finance,
auditing, IT, healthcare, and other professional disciplines. ISO/IEC 17024 outlines
essential elements that CBs must follow in their certification processes to ensure
credibility and consistency.
The standards that GAFM IBS AAPM adhere to under ISO/IEC 17024
include:
-
Scope of
Certification: CB clearly defines the scope of certification, specifying the field of
competence, relevant standards, and qualifications required for certification, ensuring
tailored certification processes for specific industries.
-
Impartiality
and Independence: CB maintains impartiality and independence in their certification
processes to avoid conflicts of interest that could compromise objectivity and
fairness.
-
Competence of
Personnel: CB employs qualified and competent personnel who receive ongoing training to
assess candidates effectively.
-
Assessment
Criteria: CB establishes transparent criteria for assessing candidate competency based
on relevant standards or industry benchmarks.
-
Exam
Development: Exams are developed by licensed professionals such as lawyers and PhDs to
ensure fairness, reliability, and validity.
-
Fairness and
Non-Discrimination: CB ensures fairness and equal opportunities for all candidates,
regardless of factors like age, ethnicity, religion, gender, or nationality.
-
Registration
and Documentation: Thorough records of candidate registrations, assessments, and
certification decisions are maintained for transparency and accountability.
-
Confidentiality:
Mechanisms are in place to safeguard candidate information and assessment
results.
-
Appeals and
Complaints: Procedures for candidates to lodge appeals or complaints regarding the
certification process are transparent and impartial.
-
Continual
Improvement: CB regularly reviews and improves their certification processes, gathering
feedback from candidates and stakeholders.
-
Validity and
Reliability: The assessment processes produce valid and reliable results, accurately
measuring candidate competence over time.
-
Risk
Management: CB identifies and manages risks associated with the certification process
to minimize disruptions or bias.
-
Feedback and
Reporting: Candidates receive feedback on their performance, and CB reports on
certification activities.
-
Compliance
with Legal and Regulatory Requirements: CB complies with relevant legal and regulatory
requirements.
-
Public
Confidence: CB works to maintain and enhance public confidence in their certification
services.
-
Peer Review:
CB may undergo peer reviews or audits to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 17024
standards.
-
Accreditation:
GAFM/IBS/AAPM seeks accreditation from recognized bodies like ISO/IEC 17024, providing
assurance of competence and credibility.
-
Exam
Preparation: Candidates can increase their chances of passing the exam through study,
reading relevant books, and taking courses from government-recognized educational
providers.
-
GAFM/IBS/AAPM
ensures that its exam processes align with ISO/IEC 17024 standards, maintaining
credibility, consistency, and reliability. Exam fees are $199 for the first attempt,
$150 for the second attempt, and $100 for the third attempt.
-
The
organizations align their exam content with Job Task Analysis (JTA) or Role Delineation
Study, ensuring validity and reliability. This involves gathering input from subject
matter experts and professionals in the field to identify required knowledge and
skills.
-
Security of
exam materials is crucial to maintaining the integrity of certification programs.
GAFM/IBS/AAPM follows strict procedures, including secure item bank management, content
development and review, secure storage, transportation, access control, and secure exam
administration.
-
ISO/IEC 17024
standards require transparency and fairness in the certification process, and
GAFM/IBS/AAPM achieves this through documents like "Instructions for Credential
Candidates," an "Exam Administration Manual," and a "Security Procedures Manual." These
documents outline procedures for eligibility, registration, candidate preparation, and
exam administration.
-
The
organizations use Job Task Analysis (JTA) to determine which courses, training, or
exams align with the job role. This involves a structured process, including task
identification, validation, competency mapping, course alignment, exam blueprint
creation, and exam development. Continuous review and updates ensure alignment with
industry trends.
Overall, GAFM, IBS,
and AAPM uphold ISO/IEC 17024 standards, providing credible, consistent, and reliable
certification processes in various professional disciplines.
Certification Exam Guidelines,
Fees, Security, JTA, Confidentiality
Under ISO/IEC 17024
requirements, the Certifying Body of GAFM AAPM IBS requires each applicant to pass an approved ISO
17024 Comprehensive Exam Assessment.
GAFM, IBS AAPM uses ISO IEC
17024 international standards that set out the requirements for the competence of personnel
certification bodies. GAFM/IBS/AAPM is herein or hereafter known as the Board of Standards or
Certifying Body (CB).
Email us or Contact us to
Schedule Your Exam with us directly or with one of our training Providers.
Under ISO/IEC 17024
requirements - GAFM/IBS/AAPM is responsible
for assessing and certifying individuals' competence against specific criteria in various fields,
such as management systems, project management, finance, auditing, IT, healthcare, or other
professional disciplines. ISO/IEC 17024 outlines the essential elements that CBs must adhere to in
their certification processes to ensure credibility and consistency.
Below are the standards that
GAFM IBS AAPM adhere to: ISO/IEC 17024 exam and assessment requirements for a Certifying
Body:
1. Scope of
Certification: CB defines the scope of
certification clearly, specifying the field of competence, the relevant standards, and the
qualifications required for certification. This ensures that the certification process is tailored
to the specific industry or discipline.
2. Impartiality and
Independence: CB establishes and maintains
impartiality and independence in their certification processes. They should not have conflicts of
interest that could compromise the objectivity and fairness of
assessments.
3. Competence of
Personnel: CB employs qualified and
competent personnel who possess the necessary technical knowledge and skills to assess candidates
effectively. Assessors also receive continuing education ongoing training to stay up-to-date with
legal and industry developments.
4. Assessment
Criteria: CB establishes clear and
transparent criteria for assessing candidate specific competency. Each exam is based on
relevant standards, industry best practices, or other accepted
benchmarks.
5. Exam
Development: GAFM/IBS/AAPM develops
comprehensive exams or assessments that accurately reflect the knowledge and skills required for
each and every certification. These assessments should be designed to be fair, reliable, and valid
and are generated by licensed professionals such as lawyers and
PhDs.
6. Fairness and
Non-Discrimination: The CB ensures that their
assessment processes are fair and nondiscriminatory. All candidates should have equal opportunities
to demonstrate their competence, regardless of factors like age, ethnicity, religion, gender, or
nationality.
7. Registration and
Documentation: CB maintains thorough records
of candidate registrations, assessments, and certification decisions. This documentation helps
ensure transparency and accountability in the certification
process.
8. Confidentiality:
CB has
established mechanisms to safeguard the confidentiality of candidate information and assessment
results.
9. Appeals and
Complaints: CB has procedures in place
for candidates to lodge appeals or complaints regarding the certification process. These procedures
are transparent and impartial.
10.Continual
Improvement: CB regularly reviews and
improves their certification processes. This includes gathering feedback from candidates and other
stakeholders and using it to enhance the quality of their services.
11.Validity and
Reliability: The CB's assessment processes
is designed to produce valid and reliable results. This means that the assessments accurately
measure candidate competence and yield consistent results over
time.
12.Risk
Management: CB also will identify and
manage risks associated with the certification process to minimize potential disruptions or bias in
assessments.
13.Feedback and
Reporting: CB provides candidates with
feedback on their performance in assessments. Additionally, CB regularly reports on
certification activities, including the number of certifications granted and any significant issues
encountered.
14.Compliance with Legal and
Regulatory Requirements: CB complies with relevant
legal and regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions where they operate. This includes adhering
to data protection laws and any industry-specific regulations.
15.Public
Confidence: CB actively works to maintain
and enhance public confidence in their certification services. This includes ensuring standards,
international standards accords, transparency, ethical conduct, and a commitment to
excellence.
16.Peer
Review: Under ISO/IEC 17024
accreditation standards, GAFM/IBS/AAPM may require CB undergo peer reviews or audits to assess
their compliance with the standard's requirements.
17.Accreditation:
GAFM/IBS/AAPM
seeks accreditation from recognized accreditation bodies to demonstrate their compliance with the
US Department of Education, and other international bodies such as: ISO/IEC 17024. Accreditation
provides additional assurance to stakeholders of the CB's competence and credibility. GAFM/IBS/AAPM
is SIS Licensed which is IAS and IAF accredited. IAS and IAF are frequently referenced and
recognized by several US Departments and Agencies.
Exam Prep: Study, reading
relevant books, and taking courses or training/education programs from any government recognized
educational provider should increase a candidate's exam score or chances of passing the
exam.
The GAFM/IBS/AAPM comports to
the international ISO/IEC 17024 standards which sets stringent requirements for Certifying Bodies
to ensure that their certification processes are credible, consistent, and reliable. Compliance
with these requirements is essential to maintaining the integrity of certifications and the trust
of stakeholders, including candidates, employers, and regulatory
authorities.
Exam
Fees:
1st Time Exam $199
dollars
2nd Attempt: $150
dollars
3rd Attempt $100
dollars
1.
Job Task Analysis (JTA) or Role Delineation Study:
·
The certification body initiated a comprehensive Job Task Analysis or Role Delineation Study. This
involves gathering information on the key responsibilities, tasks, and skills required for a
particular job or role within the industry or discipline being certified.
·
The JTA process would typically include input from subject matter experts, industry stakeholders,
and professionals currently working in the field. This collaborative effort ensures that the
analysis is comprehensive and reflects the real-world requirements of the job.
·
The results of the JTA would provide a detailed breakdown of the knowledge, skills, and abilities
(KSAs) necessary for competent performance in the specific role or field.
2.
Alignment of Exam Content:
·
Based on the findings from the JTA or Role Delineation Study, the GAFM/IBS/AAPM certification body
aligned the content of the certification exam directly with the identified knowledge, skills, and
abilities.
·
Each content area of the exam would correspond to a specific portion of the JTA, ensuring that the
assessment is a valid representation of the job requirements.
·
The GAFM/IBS/AAPM certification body established clear and transparent guidelines for the
construction of exam questions, ensuring that they accurately reflect the identified content
areas.
3.
Validation According to Psychometric Practices:
·
To ensure the validity and reliability of the assessment, the GAFM/IBS/AAPM certification body
employs psychometric practices. This involves rigorously producing, utilizing, monitoring, testing
and validating the exam questions and their alignment with the JTA.
·
Psychometricians, lawyers, or assessment experts then conducted item analysis, pilot testing, and
statistical analyses to assess the quality of exam questions.
·
The GAFM/IBS/AAPM certification body gathered data on how well the exam measures the intended
competencies, using techniques such as criterion-related validity studies, which compare exam
results with on-the-job performance data. GAFM/IBS/AAPM even utilized various languages to for
fairness to all ethnicities, cultures and religions.
·
Reliability studies are continuously conducted to ensure that the exam yields Equitible results
over time and across different administrations.
·
The certification body employes best practices in setting passing scores or cut scores,
ensuring that candidates are assessed fairly and consistently.
By following these ISO guidelines, GAFM/AAPM/IBS ensures that its standards exam process
directly aligns with the information gathered during the Job Task Analysis or Role Delineation
Study. This alignment ensures that the exam accurately reflects the knowledge and skills required
for the job or role being certified. Moreover, the validation process, grounded in psychometric
practices, guarantees that the exams are a reliable and valid measure of a candidate's competence,
enhancing the credibility and integrity of the certification program under ISO/IEC 17024 standards
and other standards including ACBSP, ECLBS, IAS, IAF, and SIS Cert.
Exam Confidentiality and Security
Under ISO/IEC 17024 standards, ensuring the security of exam materials, including the item bank and
the prevention of exposure of test content during exam administration, is crucial to maintaining
the integrity and credibility of a certification program. The specific procedures and measures to
meet this standard may vary among different credentialing organizations, but here is a general
description of how a credential can meet these security requirements:
1.
Secure Item Bank Management:
·
The credentialing organization establishes documented procedures for the secure management of its
item bank, which includes all exam questions and related content.
·
Access to the item bank is restricted to authorized personnel only, typically individuals who are
directly involved in exam development, review, or maintenance.
·
Detailed records of item bank access, changes, and updates are maintained and regularly audited to
ensure accountability.
2.
Content Development and Review:
·
When new exam items are developed or existing items are reviewed and revised, a strict process is
followed to maintain item security.
·
Item writers and subject matter experts sign confidentiality agreements to protect the security of
the content they work on.
·
Development and review meetings are conducted in secure environments, and electronic versions of
exam content are password-protected and encrypted.
3.
Secure Storage:
·
Physical copies of exam materials, including paper records and storage devices, are stored securely
in locked, access-controlled facilities.
·
Digital copies of exam materials are stored on secure servers with restricted access. Firewalls and
encryption technologies may be employed to safeguard digital content.
4.
Transportation and Distribution:
·
When exam materials need to be transported between locations (e.g., from the item bank to the
testing centers), secure transportation methods are used.
·
Transported materials are packaged and sealed in a manner that prevents tampering and unauthorized
access.
5.
Access Control:
·
Access to exam content during all stages of exam administration is strictly controlled. Only
authorized personnel have access to the content.
·
Access is typically role-based, meaning that individuals have access only to the specific exam
content relevant to their responsibilities.
6.
Secure Exam Administration:
·
During the actual exam administration, procedures are in place to prevent exposure of test content.
These may include secure computer-based testing environments, monitoring of test takers, and strict
protocols for handling paper-based exams.
·
Measures such as randomization of questions or adaptive testing may be used to reduce the risk of
cheating or content exposure.
7.
Incident Response and Reporting:
·
Procedures are documented for responding to and reporting any security breaches or incidents
related to exam content, including unauthorized access, leaks, or cheating.
Exam Administration and Security -
Meeting ISO/IEC 17024 Standards: GAFM/IBS/AAPM Exams
ISO/IEC 17024 is an international standard that sets requirements for the competence of personnel
certification bodies. It ensures that certification programs maintain high standards of quality,
security, and fairness. The GAFM/IBS/AAPM certification bodies have taken significant steps to meet
these standards through the development and implementation of essential documents such as
"Instructions for Credential Candidates," an "Exam Administration Manual," and a "Security
Procedures Manual." ADA accommodations are allowed by GAFM/IBA/AAPM
I. "Instructions for Credential Candidates"
The "Instructions for Credential Candidates," often referred to as a "Candidate Handbook," plays a
vital role in ensuring that the certification process adheres to ISO/IEC 17024 standards. Here's
how these organizations meet the standards through this document:
1.
Transparency and Fairness:
This Candidate Handbook provides information about the certification process, including eligibility
requirements, exam content, and scoring criteria. This transparency ensures fairness in the
certification process, as candidates have a clear understanding of what to expect.
2.
Appeals and Complaints:
These documents outline the procedures for candidates to file appeals or complaints if they believe
there has been an error or unfairness during the certification process. This aligns with ISO/IEC
17024's requirement for a fair and accessible appeals process.
3.
Privacy and Data Protection:
The Handbook includes information on how candidate data will be handled, ensuring compliance with
ISO/IEC 17024's standards on data protection and confidentiality.
4.
Code of Conduct:
These documents often include a code of conduct for candidates, promoting ethical behavior and
integrity in the certification process, which is in line with ISO/IEC 17024's emphasis on
impartiality and fairness.
II. Exam Administration Manual
The Exam Administration Manual is another crucial document that helps certification bodies meet
ISO/IEC 17024 standards:
1.
Security Protocols:
This manual outlines detailed security protocols for the administration of exams. It addresses
access control, monitoring, and incident reporting, ensuring compliance with ISO/IEC 17024's
requirement for secure exam administration.
2.
Candidate Identification and Verification:
It provides procedures for verifying the identity of candidates to prevent cheating or fraudulent
activities during the exam, aligning with ISO/IEC 17024's emphasis on security.
3.
Exam Delivery Methods:
The manual describes the methods used to deliver exams, whether paper-based or computer-based, and
ensures that these methods maintain the integrity and security of the certification process. Oral
exams are also allowed to those with disabilities.
III. Security Procedures Manual
The Security Procedures Manual is an indispensable document for maintaining the security of exam
materials and meeting ISO/IEC 17024 standards:
1.
Item Bank Security:
This manual outlines strict security measures for the management of the item bank, ensuring the
confidentiality and integrity of exam content.
2.
Content Development and Review:
It describes the procedures for developing and reviewing exam items, highlighting the importance of
maintaining item security and quality control.
3.
Incident Reporting:
The manual details procedures for reporting and addressing security incidents, ensuring that any
breaches or vulnerabilities are promptly addressed, as required by ISO/IEC 17024.
Security and Administration of Exam Conclusion
In conclusion, GAFM, IBS, and AAPM have taken substantial steps to meet ISO/IEC 17024 standards
through the development and implementation of essential documents such as "Instructions for
Credential Candidates," an "Exam Administration Manual," and a "Security Procedures Manual." These
documents promote transparency, fairness, security, and integrity throughout the certification
process, aligning with the stringent requirements of ISO/IEC 17024. By adhering to these standards,
these organizations ensure that their certification programs are recognized for their quality and
credibility on an international scale.
Assessment and Exam Processes and Procedures
I. Eligibility and Registration
1.
Eligibility Criteria:
·
The eligibility criteria for candidates, including prerequisites, educational qualifications, and
work experience requirements include a college diploma, agree to ethics guidelines, agree to
continuing education, securing 2 or more years of experience or related graduate education, and
pass the certification exam.
·
This eligibility criteria complies with ISO/IEC 17024 standards and is transparently communicated
to potential candidates.
2.
Registration Process:
·
GAFM/IBS/AAPM has a standardized registration procedure, including online registration forms,
payment methods, and deadlines.
·
GAFM/IBS/AAPM provides candidates with a clear understanding of the registration process, fees, and
any required documentation.
II. Candidate Preparation
3.
Candidate Information:
·
GAFM/IBS/AAPM shares comprehensive information with candidates about the certification program,
examination content, format, and relevant study materials.
·
The CB encourages candidates to review all Instructions for Credential Candidates and equivalent
online documents to understand the certification process fully.
4.
Exam Syllabus and Blueprint:
·
Each applicant has access to an exam syllabus or blueprint that outlines the topics and
competencies covered in the exam.
·
CB ensures that the exam content aligns with the results of a Job Task Analysis (JTA) or Role
Delineation Study.
JTA Job Task Analyst Report
The credential requires a portfolio of work experience, education, etc. This standard addresses the
process used to establish what job role the assessment portfolio is measuring. Here is a detailed
narrative that it is the foundation of the certification program to determine which courses,
training or exams map to the job role.
To document how the specific tasks, knowledge, job duties, and skills are measured by the
assessment process under ISO 17024 standards and how a Job Task Analysis (JTA) is used to determine
which courses, training, and exams map to the job role, the certification body follows a structured
process. Here's an explanation of how this is done:
1.
Initial Job Task Analysis (JTA):
·
The certification body initiates a Job Task Analysis (JTA) process as a critical first step.
·
The goal is to identify the essential tasks, knowledge areas, job duties, and skills required for
the job role that the certification aims to assess.
·
Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) play a crucial role in this process. They are typically individuals
with significant experience such as lawyers with MBAs or PhDs and have expertise in the field being
certified.
2.
Task Identification:
·
During the JTA, SMEs work together to identify the specific tasks and responsibilities that are
relevant to the job role.
·
This involves creating a comprehensive list of job-related tasks, knowledge domains, and
skills.
3.
Task Validation:
·
The identified tasks and knowledge areas are validated to ensure they accurately represent the job
role.
·
This validation process may involve surveys, interviews, or workshops with SMEs, employers, and
other stakeholders.
·
The goal is to confirm that the tasks and knowledge areas are current, relevant, and reflective of
industry standards.
4.
Competency Mapping:
·
For each identified task and knowledge area, the certification body maps the required competencies.
These competencies define what a certified individual should be capable of doing.
5.
Course and Training Alignment:
·
Based on the validated tasks and knowledge domains, the certification body can determine which
courses and training programs are relevant to preparing candidates for the certification.
·
The courses and training programs are chosen to cover the essential knowledge and skills needed to
perform the job role effectively.
6.
Exam Blueprint Creation:
·
Using the JTA results, an exam blueprint is developed. The blueprint specifies the percentage of
exam questions that will be dedicated to each task or knowledge area.
·
This ensures that the certification exam adequately assesses the relevant competencies.
7.
Exam Development:
·
Subject Matter Experts work collaboratively with the certification body to develop exam items
(questions) that align with the JTA findings and the exam blueprint.
·
These items are designed to evaluate candidates' knowledge and skills in the identified
areas.
8.
Documentation and Transparency:
·
Throughout this process, the certification body maintains detailed documentation of the JTA,
including task lists, validation records, and exam development records.
·
This documentation provides transparency and serves as evidence that the certification program
aligns with ISO 17024 standards.
9.
Continuous Review and Updates:
·
The certification body periodically reviews and updates the JTA and related documentation to ensure
that the certification program remains current with industry trends and evolving job roles.
|